May 2019 MQT written answers
MQT answers May 19
Question No: 2019/9214
Andrew Dismore
When will you be conducting your next set of school air quality audits? Will you consider undertaking one at Martin School in East Finchley, where air quality monitoring equipment was recently installed, and showed a reading of 46.2ug/m3, which is well above the legal limit set by the EU of 40ug/m3.?
School Air Quality Audits
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
In 2017 I took early action at schools located in areas with some of the highest air pollution levels through an audits programme. I have also provided starter grants to deliver the resulting recommendations.
Whilst I funded the first 50 school air quality audits, I have asked London boroughs to roll them out so that every school located in an area of high air pollution can benefit from this approach. To help do this a school air quality audit toolkit has been produced. I have also changed the rules so boroughs can use their TfL Local Implementation Plan funding to help undertake audits and deliver any recommendations.
I agree that Martin School would benefit from an air quality audit and would encourage the London Borough of Barnet to work with the school and local community to deliver one.
West Hampstead Overground station
Question No: 2019/9215
Andrew Dismore
The new West Hampstead Overground station is nearing completion. The construction design allows for the station to be completed with or without a ticket office. Residents are concerned that the station will lose its ticket office facility by default. Will you confirm that the ticket office will be provided in the new station?
Answer for West Hampstead Overground station
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Question No: 2019/9216
Andrew Dismore
Tube noise has not been reduced sufficiently for a number of residents, who have suffered ground borne noise well in excess of 50Db, in some case for several years and in one case rendering the property uninhabitable. in such cases will you now consider compensating residents, if necessary buying their property?
Tube noise [1]
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Transport for London (TfL) understands the importance of minimising noise levels for its neighbours and is determined to do more to achieve it. TfL is focussing its efforts on tackling tube noise and vibration at source, not through compensation. It has carried out works near over 200 homes most affected by noise, installing thousands of new track fastenings, hundreds of metres of new track, grinding rails and removing rail joints where no longer necessary. Where current technology does not reduce noise levels, TfL will continue working with suppliers and academics to innovate and develop new technology to reduce noise levels across the network.
Question No: 2019/9217
Andrew Dismore
In areas where residents are suffering excessive ground borne tube noise, reduction in train speeds have been shown to ameliorate significantly the noise they suffer. Will you now consider slowing trains outside rush hours, especially at weekends and with the night tube?
Answer for Tube noise [2]
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Question No: 2019/9218
Andrew Dismore
Why have Transport for London refused to enable the friction modifier installed at Finchley Central? Have they ensured the noise will not get even worse when the southbound track is upgraded? If so, how? Is it written into the engineering contract to ensure this (unlike last time)?
Tube noise [3]
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Transport for London (TfL) took noise measurements inside properties near Finchley Central earlier this year. These readings confirmed that the additional lubrication applied to the northbound track near the curve at Finchley Central was effective in reducing noise levels by around 10dB.
A friction modifier has been installed in this area. However, TfL identified a safety concern following testing of train braking so does not plan to activate it. it.
TfL’s contractors deliver in accordance with track construction standards set out by TfL, using TfL approved materials. This ensures that noise and vibration levels are kept as low as is practicable.
If residents are experiencing an increase in noise disturbance they can contact TfL’s Customer Service Centre on 0343 222 1234 or at tfl.gov.uk/contact
Question No: 2019/9219
Andrew Dismore
How are Transport for London monitoring the effectiveness of lubrication installed on the tracks at Finchley Central? Residents still report that trains travelling along the corner near the station still screech. Can residents get direct or live visibility on noise measurements and lubricant application times?
Tube noise [4]
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Transport for London (TfL) took noise measurements inside properties close to Finchley Central earlier this year. These readings confirmed the additional lubrication was effective in reducing noise levels by around 10dB. Following further recent complaints, TfL is arranging further measurements.
The lubricant is applied each time the tube wheels go over the lubricator located at the affected area, which occurs several hundred times per day.
If residents are experiencing an increase in noise disturbance they can contact TfL’s Customer Service Centre on 0343 222 1234 or at tfl.gov.uk/contact
Question No: 2019/9220
Andrew Dismore
Although noise may have been reduced slightly in some locations such as Finchley Central, it did not exist at all before the speed increases and northbound track upgrades. Why can Transport for London not return this noise to previous level?
Tube noise [5]
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
The northbound track upgrade was undertaken as part of Transport for London’s (TfL) wider programme of track renewals and upgrades. These works are essential for TfL to) to maintain reliability and safety on its network.
TfL is aware of recent complaints about tube noise in this area and will undertake further noise measurements and carry out practicable mitigations to reduce noise at affected properties.
Question No: 2019/9221
Andrew Dismore
How many complaints about increased tube noise have Transport for London received from Hendon Central, namely Prothero Gardens and Quadrant Close? What assessment has been made of the cause of an increase in tube noise there?
Tube noise [6]
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Transport for London (TfL) has received four complaints about tube noise in the Hendon Central area in 2019.
TfL has undertaken noise readings and targeted site visits and will be carrying out remedial works to the track this month.
Question No: 2019/9222
Andrew Dismore
Will you make a statement on when you expect the new trains to be available and running on the line? How much longer will passengers have to put up with a sub-standard service?
Answer for Gospel Oak to Barking Line
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Transport for London telephone contact numbers
Question No: 2019/9223
Andrew Dismore
Do you agree that it is important that Transport for London maintain a working telephone system for complaints, for those who do not have access to email, or would prefer to speak to someone? What then is the best customer contact number, and how do you rate performance for handling calls?
Transport for London telephone contact numbers
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Transport for London (TfL) provides customers with a variety of ways to get in contact. If a customer prefers to speak to an advisor, TfL has a telephone line available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The telephone number is 0343 222 1234 and all calls will be charged at a local rate – which is often free on many tariffs. Alternatively, TfL’s online tools allow customers to self-serve with minimal effort. These include the TfL website, TravelBot and Social Media.
The quality of TfL’s interactions with customers is assessed internally by line managers against a quality framework. The contact centre quality is also measured independently by a mystery shopping company who assess the interaction against the industry standards. This measure is included in the TfL performance scorecard.
Question No: 2019/9224
Andrew Dismore
Transport for London has expressed an intention to work with Camden to develop new plans to improve safety for all users at the Swiss Cottage gyratory system, including focus on completing certain sections of the former CS11 proposal including the Swiss Cottage gyratory. Will this include blocking the Avenue Rd side of the A41 to all traffic except buses and cycles, especially bearing in mind Transport for London’s decision to tell the 100 Avenue Rd Construction Working Group meeting that it may let lorries use the A41 (Avenue Rd) to access the site, to a greater extent and duration than is currently committed in the Essential Living Construction Management Plan, because of the indefinite suspension of plans for CS11. What is being proposed for this gyratory?
Swiss Cottage gyratory
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
The Court action by Westminster City Council in September 2018 postponed Cycle Superhighway 11 (CS11). This meant that the proposed transformation of Swiss Cottage gyratory, to reduce traffic domination and make the neighbourhood safer and less intimidating for people walking and cycling, has not progressed.
In spite of this, Transport for London (TfL) remains keen to work with Camden Council to explore new opportunities to make Swiss Cottage an even better place to live and work, reducing road danger for people walking and cycling, and making it easier for users to move through the area.
This summer, TfL will begin work with Camden Council to re-consider how the gyratory could change to realise local priorities and the Mayor’s Healthy Streets Approach. Until these investigations have concluded, I cannot provide further details on future gyratory proposals, including user access to A41 Avenue Road.
Question No: 2019/9225
Andrew Dismore
Reducing the 25 bus route from Oxford Circus to Holborn is making it harder for travellers from East London to get to the West End. Experience shows that travellers who get one before Mile End do not benefit from the hopper fare, and in effect are paying twice for the same journey, as it is more than an hour before they tap in on the 25 bus, then tap in again for the next bus to take them on to Oxford Circus. What do you plan to do about this to ensure a fair fare?
Answer for 25 bus and the Hopper fare
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Question No: 2019/9226
Andrew Dismore
Further to your answer to Question No: 2017/2921
‘When do you expect to go to consultation on the long-promised pedestrian and cycling improvements to the junction?’
Your response being:
‘Following my response to MQ 2017/1798, further detailed traffic modelling work is now required. Public consultation will follow the completion of this work and is currently planned for early 2018.’
What is the present position in effecting long overdue pedestrian and cycle safety improvements to this junction?
Answer for Stirling Corner
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Question No: 2019/9227
Andrew Dismore
Constituents have raised that Uber are operating unlawful discriminatory practices against wheelchair users, in requiring them to book larger, far more expensive cars unnecessarily, when asked to carry light, small travelling wheelchairs which would fit in an ordinary vehicle. Will you investigate this practice, and take action to stop Uber discriminating against passengers with disabilities?
Answer for Uber [1]
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Question No: 2019/9228
Andrew Dismore
Uber make it virtually impossible for customers to make an email complaint or indeed any other kind of complaint. Will you investigate this and require them to operate an accessible complaints process?
Answer for Uber [2]
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Question No: 2019/9229
Andrew Dismore
Do you agree that there is no reason now, with the bendy buses gone and one fewer bus route stopping there, for the two bus stops outside the Mornington Crescent tube station not to be reunited, to serve the 24, 27, 29 And 134 more conveniently, especially for older people who presently have to make a run for the bus stop for the next bus?
Answer for Mornington Crescent bus stops
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Joint inspection of tower blocks
Question No: 2019/9231
Andrew Dismore
Changes to the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order and the Housing Health and Safety Rating System have now been passed by Parliament, which came into force on 23 January this year Joint inspection from fire and rescue services, the Health and Safety Executive and local authorities are now able to enforce removal of dangerous cladding. What progress is being made in setting up teams in London?
Joint inspection of tower blocks
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
The national Government has asked the Local Government Association to take a lead on setting up the Joint Inspection Team. It will be a multidisciplinary taskforce to support local authorities in taking enforcement action against inactive building owners.
The taskforce was announced in June 2018; progress has been slow, though we are told it should be up and running in the next couple of months. Once it is set up, ministers must make sure the team has the power and resources it needs to be effective.
Question No: 2019/9232
Andrew Dismore
What progress is being made with the removal of dangerous cladding from private blocks?
Removal of dangerous cladding
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Data released by the Government indicate that the removal of dangerous cladding from private sector blocks has been very slow. As of April 2019, 266 private sector blocks (comprising residentials blocks, hotels, and student accommodation) have been identified with unsafe ACM cladding, and around half of these blocks will be in London. Out of these: 43 have had their cladding removed; 21 have begun remediation work; 121 have a remediation plan in place but works have not started; 41 have reported an intent to remediate and are developing plans, and 40 have no clear remediation plans.
Question No: 2019/9233
Andrew Dismore
What is the role and annual funding of the City Operations Unit and what is its relation to London Resilience?
City Operations Unit
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
The City Operations Unit are responsible for the GLA’s work with partners regarding incidents and major events in the city, ensuring that suitable briefing and support is provided to the Mayoralty.
The Unit is currently working on the development of the 24/7/365 situational awareness capability for the capital with the ability to identify, process, analyse and comprehend critical elements of information and turn this into actionable first alert intelligence.
The Unit is responsible for the ongoing development and delivery of the GLA’s response protocols in the event of a major incident, rising-tide scenario and public order events.
The Unit represents the GLA at the London Resilience Forum, the London Resilience Partnership, Strategic Coordinating Groups and manages the day-to-day operational relationship between the GLA and London Resilience Group.
The Unit is also responsible for the development of pan-London key agency coordination plans for the delivery of major events and state ceremonials/occasions where there is likely to be a high impact on business as usual, the transport network and/or other disruption to the capital.
The 2019/20 budget for the City Operations Unit is £500k, however, some staffing costs are held in External Affairs for historical reasons. This will be addressed in time for the 2019-20 budget process.
Question No: 2019/9234
Andrew Dismore
What was the number, total value and average value of contracts, if any, the Greater London Authority family held with Interserve before it went into administration?
Answer for Interserve
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Question No: 2019/9235
Andrew Dismore
Recent research by Stephanie Peacock MP shows just 15% of schools built since 2011 have sprinklers fitted. How many schools built in London under the Priority School Building Programme and free schools programme have been fitted with sprinklers, and how many were built in total?
Sprinklers in schools
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
London Fire Brigade (LFB) has campaigned for sprinklers to be made mandatory in all new schools and major refurbishments for over a decade and recommends their use in each building control consultation it responds to. However, LFB does not receive details of whether a build proceeds with sprinklers included and does not collect specific data on whether a school is part of the Priority School Building Programme or free schools programme.
Fire safety in historic buildings [1]
Question No: 2019/9236
Andrew Dismore
What steps is London Fire Brigade taking to improve fire prevention and response across London’s historic buildings of religious and cultural value?
Fire safety in historic buildings [1]
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
London Fire Brigade’s (LFB) fire safety inspection programme includes working with heritage and historic sites across London. A heritage co-ordinator within the Fire Safety department assists and supports heritage sites by engaging with external stakeholders, such as English Heritage and Royal Palaces, and to review their emergency plans, salvage plans, out of hours response plans and gathers relevant information for operational response considerations.
The LFB emergency response to heritage sites is practiced through borough based exercises. Recent examples include salvage exercises at the Guildhall and the Tower of London alongside the Royal Palaces salvage teams. Further exercises planned for this year include St Paul’s Cathedral and Hampton Court.
Following the fire at Notre Dame LFB are writing to all known historic buildings in London reiterating advice on fire safety in historic buildings and on the need for salvage plans. This letter will be sent by the end of May.
Question No: 2019/9237
Andrew Dismore
During the operation to save Notre Dame cathedral, the Brigade des sapeurs-pompiers de Paris used a robot, “colossus” and drones to aid firefighters. What assessment has London Fire Brigade made of the help a similar robot would give to operations in London?
London Fire Brigade equipment
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
London Fire Brigade (LFB) is not currently investigating the use of colossus or similar robots for firefighting. LFB has representation on both national and regional research and development forums and is not aware that colossus or any similar robots are currently being investigated at any of these forums. However, LFB will look closely at colossus over the next six months, to see whether this type of technology might be able to be used successfully to aid firefighting and improve firefighter safety in the context of London’s complex and varied built environment.
LFB keeps abreast of technological developments that could improve incident commander’s situational awareness or support firefighter safety by allowing them to extinguish fires remotely.
Question No: 2019/9238
Andrew Dismore
You stated that the London Fire Commissioner had a meeting scheduled in April with the Housing minister to discuss fitting and retrofitting of sprinklers. What was the outcome of that meeting?
Sprinklers
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
The London Fire Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner for Fire Safety met the Housing Minister on 24 April and discussed a number of key issues including remediation work on private blocks, consultations that arose from the Hackitt review and sprinklers. They also gave examples of cases where buildings in London are not being built in accordance with the plans provided to LFB. The Government has since made an announcement on remediation for private blocks and further outcomes of the meeting will become apparent as the Government makes further announcements on these issues.
Electrical appliance safety in public sector fittings
Question No: 2019/9239
Andrew Dismore
London Fire Brigade have recommended consumers do not buy plastic-backed appliances. What steps have you taken to ensure the fit-out on homes built using Greater London Authority money or on GLA land does not use these unsafe appliances?
Electrical appliance safety in public sector fittings
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
I would expect all Londoners to heed the advice of the London Fire Brigade. The London Fire Brigade’s Total Recalls campaign highlights issues with unsafe electrical goods. Ultimately, however, it is the job of central Government to regulate building materials, components and appliances. Any schemes receiving GLA funding will still need to secure planning permission and comply with building regulations, and building owners and individual occupants will need to comply with relevant legislation when managing and occupying new homes.
Support for residents living with flammable cladding (1)
Question No: 2019/9240
Andrew Dismore
Surveys by the UK Cladding Action Group of residents in private tower blocks with flammable cladding showed that a quarter (25.5%) have sought medical help due to mental health issues, while 15.3% said they were receiving medical attention. A total of 38.3% of residents said they had turned to alcohol to help cope with the stress while 8.7% said they were experiencing suicidal feelings as a result. Will you consider writing to the relevant building owners in London and NHS organisations asking them to provide support for these individuals?
Support for residents living with flammable cladding (1)
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
The impact of the tragedy at Grenfell Tower was widespread, and I wrote to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care last October seeking assurance that plans were in place to meet the physical and mental health needs of affected families.
This report shines a light on how wide the impacts of the Grenfell tragedy have been and it is vital to ensure the right support is available to everyone who may be affected.
It is unacceptable that residents should shoulder the burden of the cost of remedial work to remove cladding on privately-owned high-rise buildings. The Government has finally recognised this, recently announcing that they will fund the removal of unsafe ACM cladding.
Support for residents living with flammable cladding (2)
Question No: 2019/9241
Andrew Dismore
Has the Greater London Authority considered establishing or procuring a loans facility to provide reasonable credit to leaseholders affected by interim fire safety and remediation costs in blocks with flammable cladding?
Support for residents living with flammable cladding (2)
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
All the GLA’s housing funding comes from the Government and so any proposal to help leaseholders would need to be supported by them.
Although the Government has finally announced it will cover the cost of removing unsafe ACM cladding in privately owned blocks, this funding will not cover the cost of interim fire safety measures, nor other fire safety works not related to ACM cladding, and so my team will raise with Government our concern about the size of bills that individual leaseholders could still face for works to make their buildings safe.
Public sector flammable cladding remediation
Question No: 2019/9242
Andrew Dismore
What was the total amount of cladding remediation funding awarded to the Greater London Authority to deal with public and social housing in London, and how much of it has been a) spent and b) committed, covering how many buildings?
Answer for Public sector flammable cladding remediation
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
Rate of flammable cladding remediation on private buildings
Question No: 2019/9243
Andrew Dismore
How many privately-owned tall buildings with ACM-type cladding have been identified in London, how many have plans in place for remediation, how many have started remediation, and how many have completed remediation, since the launch of the Government’s building safety programme? Please provide this figure on a quarterly basis from the earliest suitable date.
Answer for Rate of flammable cladding remediation on private buildings
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
London Fire Brigade support for boroughs
Question No: 2019/9244
Andrew Dismore
Which boroughs have requested London Fire Brigade advice on the risk posed by tall buildings with flammable cladding in the last 24 months?
London Fire Brigade support for boroughs
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
London Fire Brigade (LFB) routinely liaises with all London boroughs on issues of fire safety proactively and reactively, through liaison with local borough commanders, fire safety teams and the fire safety helpdesk at LFB headquarters. Over the last 24 months, information will have been exchanged with every London borough through these mechanisms including issues relating to high rise premises and cladding.
A senior LFB officer attends the Local Authority Housing Director’s Fire Safety Steering Group and the Local Authority Housing Director’s Fire Safety Group meetings each month at London Councils which have had a particular focus in the last two years on issues relating to high rise residential accommodation, including cladding issues. This forum is open to all London Boroughs.
Question No: 2019/9245
Andrew Dismore
How many joint inspections between London Fire Brigade and local authority housing officers of tall residential buildings with flammable cladding have been carried out in each quarter in the last two years? Please provide this data by borough
Joint fire safety inspections
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
London Fire Brigade (LFB) requires the attendance of the Responsible Person (RP) or their representative at an inspection. This would include a representative from the local authority where the local authority is the RP for the building.
In the last two years LFB has made in excess of 1200 visits to high rise premises with suspected flammable cladding. Of these, 316 visits have been conducted at premises with confirmed flammable cladding.
Visits to premises to with confirmed flammable cladding by borough:
Borough | Visits | Borough | Visits | |
Barking & Dagenham | 1 | Hillingdon | 2 | |
Barnet | 6 | Hounslow | 2 | |
Bexley | 0 | Islington | 9 | |
Brent | 23 | Kensington & Chelsea | 2 | |
Bromley | 1 | Kingston Upon Thames | 0 | |
Camden | 6 | Lambeth | 9 | |
City of London | 1 | Lewisham | 3 | |
Croydon | 14 | Merton | 9 | |
Ealing | 8 | Newham | 14 | |
Enfield | 1 | Redbridge | 2 | |
Greenwich | 45 | Richmond Upon Thames | 0 | |
Hackney | 14 | Southwark | 13 | |
Hammersmith & Fulham | 5 | Sutton | 3 | |
Haringey | 12 | Tower Hamlets | 65 | |
Harrow | 2 | Waltham Forest | 4 | |
Havering | 0 | Wandsworth | 14 | |
Westminster | 26 |
MQT late answers Feb 19
Question No: 2019/3867
Andrew Dismore
In Camden in the last 12 months, how many s60 stop and search operations have taken place; on what dates; how many of these were borough wide; and in relation to any that were borough wide what was the reason for the s60s concerned?
Answer for S60 stop and search
The Mayor
Last updated: 28 February, 2019
Officers are drafting a response
S60 stop and search
The Mayor
Last updated: 21 May, 2019
Please see the attached for the time and dates of Section 60s taking place in Camden during the period specified. The data also includes a breakdown of those Section 60s interpreted as “borough wide” from the data.
Section 60s are authorised based on police intelligence of incidents that have taken place, or information received that would lead officers to believe that violence was going to take place. This intelligence can be operationally sensitive and not suitable for publication.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IMPORTANT: Please ensure that the Notes Page is read in conjunction with the data in this report to ensure that it is interpreted correctly. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MPS Section 60 (Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994) issued in Camden | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 February 2018 to 31 January 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 of the 29 Section 60 authorisations shown below are “borough wide” (please see Notes) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date of section 60 | Borough wide? | Grand Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Start Date and Time | End Date and Time | No | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/02/2019 14:00:00 | 02/02/2019 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/11/2018 16:00:00 | 02/11/2018 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/02/2019 14:00:00 | 03/02/2019 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
03/02/2019 16:00:00 | 04/02/2019 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/09/2018 16:20:00 | 06/09/2018 06:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/11/2018 20:30:00 | 07/11/2018 03:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
07/11/2018 16:00:00 | 08/11/2018 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/02/2019 21:22:00 | 12/02/2019 06:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/05/2018 21:00:00 | 12/05/2018 12:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15/09/2018 16:00:00 | 16/09/2018 06:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16/01/2019 18:30:00 | 17/01/2019 03:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16/09/2018 16:00:00 | 17/09/2018 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17/10/2018 16:00:00 | 18/10/2018 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19/09/2018 16:00:00 | 20/09/2018 07:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20/02/2018 22:21:00 | 21/02/2018 07:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21/02/2018 12:00:00 | 22/02/2018 03:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21/04/2018 00:15:00 | 21/04/2018 12:15:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21/04/2018 21:15:00 | 22/04/2018 12:15:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21/09/2018 16:00:00 | 22/09/2018 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22/02/2018 12:30:00 | 23/02/2018 03:30:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22/09/2018 16:00:00 | 23/09/2018 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23/02/2018 12:30:00 | 24/02/2018 03:30:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23/04/2018 21:40:00 | 24/04/2018 03:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24/02/2018 12:30:00 | 25/02/2018 03:30:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24/10/2018 16:10:00 | 25/10/2018 07:10:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26/11/2018 19:10:00 | 26/11/2018 21:30:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29/01/2019 20:30:00 | 30/01/2019 03:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31/01/2019 14:00:00 | 01/02/2019 04:00:00 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total | 16 | 12 | 28 |