MQT Answers for October

Mount Pleasant

Question No: 2015/3506

Andrew Dismore

The Mount Pleasant community have worked up a detailed alternative proposal for the development of the site. Will you support their  alternative proposals and bid?

Written response from the Mayor

I have not seen the scheme. If a planning application is submitted and is of such a scale that it is referable to me (which may well be the case), then I am duty bound to consider it and advise the Council(s) if it complies with the London Plan. I am not able to lend support or comment publically on it if so, so as to not fetter my decision making role.

Regeneration‘ of Spur Road/Stonegrove estate Edgware

Question No: 2015/3507

Andrew Dismore

One of your flagship projects Mayor of London’s First Steps Project is part funding the ‘regeneration’ of Spur Road/Stonegrove estate Edgware. Are you aware that the construction standards are poor, and that repairs are not effected properly , and complaints  to Barratts and  Family Mosaic ignored or not satisfactorily dealt with, including frequently interrupted heating and hot water supply, poor noise insulation, badly built roofs ( one blew off entirely), and flooding in the car park likely to lead to damp problems. Residents have written to you about these issues. Do you think it right that GLA money should be used on substandard construction on homes for first time buyers and tenants; and if not what are you going to do about it?

Written response from the Mayor

My team have contacted the developer and are investigating the claims. These issues are largely regulatory matters which sit with the Homes & Communities Agency.

Shomrin

Question No: 2015/2843

Andrew Dismore

Do you agree with the Commissioner of Police’s reported comments at the Chief Rabbi’s conference, that Shomrin’s volunteers and vehicles look to much like police officers and cars; if so, what action do you propose to take; and if not will you disassociate yourself from the Commissioner’s views?

Written response from the Mayor

I am a great supporter of Shomrim and they do an outstanding job in protecting their community. However, no one should imitate a police officer or police vehicle as this can cause confusion. I am sure that the Commissioner and Shomrim will be able to resolve any misunderstandings.

Proscribed terrorist organisations

Question No: 2015/3508

Andrew Dismore

At the demonstration against the visit of Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, held outside Downing Street on Wednesday 9 September, some protesters were  flying the flags of the proscribed terrorist organisations Hamas and Hezbollah. Hezbollah and Hamas’ military wings are proscribed by the UK as terror organisations. What action has the Metropolitan Police taken over this?

Written response from the Mayor

The right to peaceful protest is a part of our constitution.

However we should not have people supporting terrorism and terrorist organisations on the streets of London, and following an earlier incident in Parliament Square concerns were raised with the Police.   On this occasion I am informed that the Hezbollah flag was seen to be flown. The display of this flag alone does not constitute an offence unless it is combined with other actions such as chanting.   Officers actively sought this additional evidence, but there was none. However, the Police recognised the concern this flag might cause and directed the flags be put away to prevent any disorder.

 

I am aware that video of the protest has been reviewed. The only chanting recorded was, “Free Palestine”. The Office of Security & Counter Terrorism (CT) and the CT Section of the Crown Prosecution Service were consulted, and concurred that no offences had been committed. Had there been evidence I am confident that the MPS would take action where offences are committed.

Children under 18 in police cells

Question No: 2015/3509

Andrew Dismore

Over the last 6 months, how many children under 18 have been held  a) overnight and b) over a weekend in police cells?

Written response from the Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Dangerous Dogs (1)

Question No: 2015/3510

Andrew Dismore

How many dogs were held in kennels by the Met in the last 12 months?

Written response from the Mayor

The MPS record data on dog seizures by financial year. The data provided is the most recent data based on the first 6 months of the current financial year which is readily available.

Between 1st April and 30th September the MPS seized 556 dogs.

Dangerous Dogs (2)

Question No: 2015/3511

Andrew Dismore

How many of those dogs held in kennels by the Met in the last 12 months were returned to their owners?

Written response from the Mayor

Between 1st April and 30th September the MPS returned 366 dogs to their owners. 40 dogs were re-homed to charities after either a Court Ordered Deprivation or Safe Guarding intervention identified an unsuitable owner.

Dangerous Dogs (3)

Question No: 2015/3512

Andrew Dismore

How many of those dogs held in kennels by the Met in the last 12 months were destroyed with the consent  of the owners

Written response from the Mayor

Between 1st April and 30th September the MPS destroyed 65 dogs after disclaimers were received.

Dangerous Dogs (4)

Question No: 2015/3513

Andrew Dismore

How many of those dogs held in kennels by the Met in the last 12 months were ordered to be destroyed by a court?

Written response from the Mayor

The MPS records data on dog seizures by financial year timescales. The data provided is the most recent data based on the first 6 months of the current financial year which is readily available.

Between 1st April and 30th September the MPS destroyed 42 dogs on the order of a Court.

Dangerous Dogs (5)

Question No: 2015/3514

Andrew Dismore

What was the cost of destroying and other vet fees relating to dogs held in kennels by the Met in the last 12 months?

Written response from the Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Dangerous Dogs (6)

Question No: 2015/3515

Andrew Dismore

How much was recovered from owners of the dogs held in kennels by the Met in the last 12 months?

Written response from the Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Dangerous Dogs (7)

Question No: 2015/3516

Andrew Dismore

In what circumstances is the Met legally entitled to recover costs of kenneling dangerous from dogs’ owners?

Written response from the Mayor

While the CPS can make an application for reasonable costs incurred in bringing the prosecution, or for the costs in retaining a dog pending its destruction, any award made by a Court is subject to the discretion of the Justices.

Knife crime (1)

Question No: 2015/3517

Andrew Dismore

How many incidents of knife crime have there been in Barnet over the last 6 months; and what were the comparative figures for the same period last year?

Written response from the Mayor

There were 184 knife crime offences in Barnet in the last 6 months (April to September 2015) compared to 121 similar offences in the same period the previous year (April to September 2014).

The change to recording of violent crime may have had an effect on recorded violent crime that has been flagged as knife crime.

Knife crime (2)

Question No: 2015/3518

Andrew Dismore

How many incidents of knife crime have there been in Camden over the last 6 months; and what were the comparative figures for the same period last year?

Written response from the Mayor

There were 163 knife crime offences in Camden in the last 6 months (April to September 2015) compared to 120 similar offences in the same period the previous year (April to September 2014).

The change to recording of violent crime may have had an effect on recorded violent crime that has been flagged as knife crime.

Islamophobic crime (1)

Question No: 2015/3519

Andrew Dismore

How many incidents of Islamophobic crime have there been in Barnet over the last 6 months; and what were the comparative figures for the same period last year?

Written response from the Mayor

Please find below the number of Islamophobic offences in Barnet for April 15- September 15, and also for the same 6 months in 2014.

April 14-Sept 14 April 15- Sept 15
Barnet 7 9

It is never acceptable for people in London to face an attack on the basis of their faith. Tackling Hate Crime is a key priority and last year I launched my Hate Crime Reduction Strategy. I am always extremely concerned about incidents of hate crime and I am watching this issue closely. It is also important that people feel confident to report all incidents of hate crime when they occur.

I welcome the Prime Minister’s recent announcement that all Islamophobic hate crimes will now be recorded in a separate category across all force areas.

Islamophobic crime (2)

Question No: 2015/3520

Andrew Dismore

How many incidents of Islamophobic crime have there been in Camden over the last 6 months; and what were the comparative figures for the same period last year?

Written response from the Mayor

Please find below the number of Islamophobic offences in Camden for April 15- September 15, and also for the same 6 months in 2014.

April 14-Sept 14 April 15- Sept 15
Camden 23 15

It is never acceptable for people in London to face an attack on the basis of their faith. Tackling hate Crime is a key priority and last year I launched my Hate Crime Reduction Strategy. I am always extremely concerned about incidents of hate crime and I am watching this issue closely. It is also important that people feel confident to report all incidents of hate crime when they occur.

I welcome the Prime Minister’s recent announcement that all Islamophobic hate crimes will now be recorded in a separate category across all force areas.

PCSOs (1)

Question No: 2015/3521

Andrew Dismore

How many PCSOs posts in Barnet are in jeopardy due to funding cuts?

Written response from the Mayor

It is likely that the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) will face an extremely challenging budget situation. However, neither the police funding formula proposals nor the Spending Review have been agreed and finalised and therefore no decisions have yet been made.

PCSOs (2)

Question No: 2015/3522

Andrew Dismore

How many PCSOs posts in Camden are in jeopardy due to funding cuts?

Written response from the Mayor

Please see MQ 3521 / 2015.

Chief Inspectors (1)

Question No: 2015/3523

Andrew Dismore

How many Chief Inspectors posts in Barnet are in jeopardy due to funding cuts?

Written response from the Mayor

It is likely that the MPS will face an extremely challenging budget situation. However, neither the police funding formula proposals nor the Spending Review have been agreed and finalised and therefore no decisions have yet been made on savings.

Chief Inspectors (2)

Question No: 2015/3524

Andrew Dismore

How many Chief Inspectors posts in Camden are in jeopardy due to funding cuts?

Written response from the Mayor

It is likely that the MPS will face an extremely challenging budget situation. However, neither the police funding formula proposals nor the Spending Review have been agreed and finalised and therefore no decisions have yet been made on savings.

Merging BCUs

Question No: 2015/3525

Andrew Dismore

Which Police Borough commands are under consideration for merger due to funding cuts?

Written response from the Mayor

As part of the work the MPS are undertaking in response to the proposed reductions in funding, they are exploring all options to meet the funding challenge. No decisions have been taken.

Police Buildings

Question No: 2015/3526

Andrew Dismore

Which police buildings are being considered for disposal due to funding cuts?

Written response from the Mayor

MOPAC continues to deliver its approved Estates Strategy for 2013 – 2016.

Graffiti in East Finchley

Question No: 2015/3527

Andrew Dismore

Graffiti in East Finchley has been getting worse, including

shop fronts on Church Lane being  graffitied with anti-Semitic abuse. What are you doing about this, bearing in mind your cuts to the ward safer neighbourhood team  has made deterring and catching offenders of such anti social behaviour more difficult?

Written response from the Mayor

I recognise your concern that these sorts of incidents can make a communities feel unsafe.

Graffiti incidents in East Finchley and the Church Lane area are being investigated by the Community Safety Unit and have been linked to a suspect identified from their enquiries.

This is a priority patrol area for the Dedicated Ward Officers who have conducted reassurance visits with local businesses. Additional Safer Neighbourhood Team officers have also patrolled the area to increase a police presence. Police have liaised with both the Community Safety Team and Shomrim regarding the incidents.

There have been no cuts to neighbourhood terms, in fact, in Barnet the numbers have risen by 75 since 2011.

A41flooding

Question No: 2015/3528

Andrew Dismore

On 16th September, and not for the first time, the A41 was badly flooded northbound at Brent Cross. When will you sort out the drainage of this road, so that traffic is  able to flow properly at times of heavy rain?

Written response from the Mayor

TfL has a pumping station at this location which worked as planned throughout the recent heavy rainfall.  They have however contacted Thames Water relating to limited capacity of the drainage system beyond the pumps and Thames Water acknowledges capacity constraints on their network. These could potentially be addressed by Thames Water constructing an attenuation tank, the cost of which has been estimated to be in the region of £7m and is being considered in conjunction with potential works related to the Brent Cross Redevelopment.

Stirling Corner (1)

Question No: 2015/3529

Andrew Dismore

What progress is being made with improvement to pedestrian crossing facilities across the A1 at Stirling Corner?

Written response from the Mayor

I understand that you met TfL officers on site in June to discuss potential designs for improved pedestrian crossing facilities on the southern side of Stirling Corner roundabout. The designs are currently being updated and a feasibility assessment will be completed by January 2016.

Stirling Corner (2)

Question No: 2015/3530

Andrew Dismore

As is now well over 3 years since you promised to cycle round Stirling Corner, and despite regular reminders of your promise you have failed to do so, do you intend to honour your promise before you leave office as Mayor next May?

Written response from the Mayor

It is now well over 3 years since you first asked a question about cycling round Stirling Corner. The answer I gave at the time was ‘I cycle the whole of London. When I next do Stirling Corner I will give you a report.’

Mill Hill Circus

Question No: 2015/3531

Andrew Dismore

What progress is being made with plans to improve Mill Hill Circus?

Written response from the Mayor

TfL has completed preliminary design for a proposed scheme to reduce congestion at the junction. The scheme requires a transfer of land from the London Borough of Barnet to TfL before the proposals can progress to public consultation. Discussions are underway and final agreement on this issue is expected by early 2016.

Dollis Valley Greenwalk

Question No: 2015/3532

Andrew Dismore

Barnet Council have spent hundreds of thousands of pounds of Transport for London money on the “upgrade” of Dollis Valley Greenwalk from Dollis Road to Fursby Road. This was done without any public consultation, proper planning or consideration of the Health and Safety of users. Users were not informed of the works until the month before the project was scheduled and then with just basic information. The resulting path does not comply with the Department for Transport ‘Shared Use Routes for Pedestrians and Cyclists (LTN 1/12)’ or TfL’s ‘London Cycling Design Standards’. This is also an area for Nature Conservation and Green Chains but this was not considered with trees and vegetation removed, the contours changed, and, many plants, likely in seed form, foreign to the area brought in during the path construction and not monitored or eliminated when they later grew. In the process of building this path, the contractors raised it in some places by more than 40cm and it consisted of various layers – gravel, base layer asphalt and top layer. The majority of users are pedestrians where the interaction with the surface is with a foot strike. The harder the surface is, the greater the force back through the body. If you are jogging or running the force is even greater. The needs of pedestrians have been overlooked in the interest of cyclists: do you agree that pedestrians should be given proper priority in this Walk and what are you going to do to ensure TfL money is spent appropriately?

Written response from the Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Railings on island in Euston Rd

Question No: 2015/3533

Andrew Dismore

Further to Question No: 2015/2845:

‘As part of their London-wide policy Transport for London have removed railings on the island in the middle of Euston Rd at the junction with Judd St and Midland Rd. This has  a detrimental impact upon blind and partially sighted people as the railings act as a vital guide for blind and partially sighted people to follow as they seek to cross one lane of traffic then the other.  Without the railings people will simply walk straight across if they can’t see how the crossing works and therefore face the situation of walking into moving traffic. Will you reverse this change, especially as the crossing is close to the head office of RNIB?’

Your response being:

‘The removal of unnecessary and redundant street furniture aligns with my Better Streets initiative.  When considering the removal of pedestrian guard railing the objective must always be to remove it without negative impact on pedestrian safety.

The guidance criteria used in assessing the removal of guard rail, issued in 2012, is based on analysis of around 150 junctions and 200 staggered crossings in central London.  It notes that in delineating between footway and carriageway the kerb edge can perform the same function as guard rail.  The nationally recognised means of assisting blind or partially sighted people in locating crossing places is by the use of tactile paving, and not guard rail.

Guard rail can provide a false sense of security to pedestrians in situations where the barrier itself would not in reality provide protection from a moving vehicle.  In some busy areas the reduction in space combined with the barrier has also been seen to force pedestrians into the carriageway on the ‘wrong’ side of the railing – particularly in central reservations.

All guard rail removal locations undergo a thorough design and review process, part of which includes a Road Safety Audit. This process ensures a balanced assessment of all guard rail removal locations which takes into account the requirements for all user groups and Stakeholders. Furthermore, whenever guard rail is removed, the site is monitored for any change in casualty statistics.  If the RNIB has specific concerns over this site, then of course TfL would be happy to consider them and they have, on occasions, made exceptions to the standard practice based on the specific needs of the local population.  I will ask TfL officers to contact the RNIB in this regard.’

Have TfL now discussed the issue with RNIB, and if so with what result; and if not, when will contact with RNIB be made and what is the explanation for any delay?

Written response from the Mayor

TfL has made contact with the RNIB, and TfL officers would be happy to meet with them on site to discuss further. TfL is currently awaiting the RNIB’s response.

Torriano Primary school pedestrian safety

Question No: 2015/3534

Andrew Dismore

Are you aware of the  concerns of Torriano Primary school over pedestrian safety at the  junction for which TfL is responsible at Camden Road (A503) with Camden Park Road/Torriano Avenue (A5200); and what are you going to do about them ?

Written response from the Mayor

TfL was made aware of the pedestrian safety concerns raised by Torriano Primary School in September 2015. Possible alterations to the junction are being considered and I understand a meeting is being arranged with Torriano Primary school to discuss their concerns in detail.

HS2 (1)

Question No: 2015/3535

Andrew Dismore

further to Question No: 2015/2817:

‘What assessment have you made of the increase in lorry movements as a consequence of HS2 construction in a) Euston and b) Hampstead and Kilburn?’

Your response being:

‘HS2 has undertaken a number of assessments utilising TfL strategic highway models to test the impacts of HS2 construction on London’s road network.  TfL has been working with HS2 on these assessments and has been pressing HS2 to undertake more detailed modelling to better understand the impacts at key junctions.  In addition, TfL has been pressing HS2 to consider the cumulative impacts of construction at numerous worksites across London which will impact on London’s strategic road network (TLRN).

Amongst the measures that TfL has proposed is that HS2 adopt stricter standards for construction vehicles including embedding the Construction Logistics and Cycle Safety (CLOCS) and the Freight Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS) to ensure that the highest quality logistics operation is used to minimise vehicle emissions and improve safety for all road users.  Adopting CLOCS and FORS is widely recognised by the UK construction industry and has yielded significant benefits to local communities affected by construction as well as wider benefits to London.  In addition, TfL has been working with HS2 to utilise more sustainable modes across London and in particular the use of rail for the transport of construction spoil and materials’.

What has been HS2’s response to your arguments?

Written response from the Mayor

As I have said previously, the current HS2 proposals are inadequate and TfL has been pressing for changes for sometime.

HS2 Ltd is in the process of revising their Draft Code of Construction Practice and Route Wide Traffic Management Plan and has had meetings with TfL to further understand its requirements with regard to vehicle emissions and road safety for vulnerable road users.

TfL is confident that HS2 Ltd will adopt industry-leading standards on these important issues as already agreed for other major projects including the Northern line Extension and Thames Tideway Tunnel. With regard to the use of rail for the transportation of construction materials, I understand that HS2 Ltd is currently investigating how the use of rail can be maximised for its construction works and I look forward to seeing the results of this work in the near future.

HS2 (2)

Question No: 2015/3536

Andrew Dismore

Will you conduct an alternative traffic survey to that of HS2 Ltd, to check their conclusions of  the effect of HS2 on traffic; and to  determine the scale and  extent of traffic and traffic flows now, prior  HS2 works commencing?

Written response from the Mayor

Our approach from the outset has been to work with HS2 on the development of their plans and where required to use existing and established traffic surveys and models for their analysis of traffic impacts.

The traffic survey data used by HS2 is a combination of datasets collected by both TfL and HS2. TfL and HS2 agreed on the calibration methodology used to join the datasets and HS2 has undertaken a number of assessments utilising TfL strategic highway models. To complement the modelling exercise, TfL has permanent traffic counts in the area and will be able to monitor the variation in traffic flows prior and during HS2 works.

As the project progresses we would expect HS2 Ltd to undertake further surveys which take account of any changes to London’s traffic ahead of the start of construction.

HS2 (3)

Question No: 2015/3537

Andrew Dismore

Will you be petitioning against HS2’s AP3 proposals and supplementary Environmental Statement; and if so what will your arguments be, in summary; and if not, why not?

Written response from the Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

HS2 (4)

Question No: 2015/3538

Andrew Dismore

Once the new expanded post HS2 Station is operational, what are TfL’s  predicted figures for Station traffic, i.e. Servicing vehicles and taxis?  Is the expectation that Camden residential roads like Delancey Street will have to tolerate this extra traffic?  Can and will TfL restrict numbers of servicing vehicles and taxis?

Written response from the Mayor

Proposals for the new station at Euston need to adequately accommodate all traffic movements that will be generated once the station is operational. This includes provision for buses, taxis, cars and servicing vehicles. The proposals being put forward to Parliament do address these issues and as the plans progress further I will continue to press HS2 to ensure impacts on local streets are minimised.

HS2 (5)

Question No: 2015/3539

Andrew Dismore

Given the already dangerous levels of air pollution in Camden now,  what additional measures is the Mayor and TfL going to take to make sure residents are not exposed to any increase in pollution as a consequence of HS2?

Written response from the Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

ESOL and ASB cuts (2)

Question No: 2015/3540

Andrew Dismore

What do you consider the impact on Londoners will be of central Government’s decisions to cut both ESOL (English for Speakers of Other Languages) funding and the Adult Skills Budget (ASB) including for ‘Mandated’ ESOL courses, which are ESOL courses for unemployed people referred directly by Job Centre Plus because of their low level of English as a second language and who are obliged to attend in order to continue to receive benefit usually, Job Seeker’s Allowance or Employment and Support Allowance?

Written response from the Mayor

I do not currently have responsibility for skills budgets. However I recognise that the reductions will impact the availability of much needed provision for low skilled groups in London. I will be assessing more precisely the need in provision for ESOL as part of our ongoing reform and devolution plans.

ESOL and ASB cuts (3)

Question No: 2015/3541

Andrew Dismore

How many teaching and other redundancies do you expect  to occur in London FE colleges as a result  of central Government’s decisions to cut both ESOL funding and the Adult Skills Budget (ASB)?

Written response from the Mayor

I do not have access to this information; this is the responsibility of the Government.

ESOL and ASB cuts (4)

Question No: 2015/3542

Andrew Dismore

The Adult Skills Budget, which had already been cut by 32% over the last 5 years, has been further cut by 27.8% this year. What will be the  impact on adult (19+) courses for ESOL, for  those students enrolling on these courses are not obliged to do so by job centres, but are either unemployed or in low-paid/part-time employment,  including refugees and asylum-seekers, as well as those who have come from within the EU to work?

Written response from the Mayor

Please see my response to MQ 3540/ 2015.

Taxi Drivers

Question No: 2015/3543

Andrew Dismore

Do you regret calling taxi drivers ‘luddites’?

Written response from the Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Tour de France

Question No: 2015/3544

Andrew Dismore

How much money and staff time was spent in the preparation of your bid to host the 2017 Tour de France grand depart which you withdrew at the last minute?

Written response from the Mayor

Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.

Metropolitan Police services

Question No: 2015/3545

Andrew Dismore

What Metropolitan Police services are under consideration for privatisation?

Written response from the Mayor

The Commercial Strategy supports the delivery of the medium term financial strategy. This will see MPS exploring a number of commercial approaches to ensure that back and middle office services are being operated in an as effective and economic way as possible and is currently made up of the following areas:

Corporate Real Estate – This is an outsourced service

Transport – This is an outsourced service

Business Support Services – payroll and pensions has previously been outsourced, and in October 2015 Finance, HR and Procurement transactional functions were outsourced to SSCL.

Logistics – the National Managed Uniform Service is currently at contract award stage, and will be implemented from April 2016. Other logistical services are currently in the process of being scoped or are at various business case stages;

ICT Services – This is an outsourced service.

Command and Control – This is a contract for the Command and Control system, it is not an outsourced service.

Criminal Justice – This is currently being scoped and consists of a number of administrative and IT areas supporting prosecutions.

Policing Fraud

Question No: 2015/3546

Andrew Dismore

Are you satisfied with the performance of the Metropolitan Police in dealing with fraud?

Written response from the Mayor

I identified fraud as a priority in my business crime strategy, creating the Business Crime Change Board to drive forward improvement in the response to online fraud and increasing the Met’s capability to deal with fraud.

A significant investment has been made creating FALCON, providing the necessary expertise to investigate all reported cases where there are viable lines of enquiry. Recent evidence shows performance rates increasing with 814 arrests made and £1.1m in cash seized or confiscated.

I am also pleased that with the recent launch of the London Digital Security Centre, small and medium sized businesses can seek help to protect themselves against cyber risks and threats including frauds.

This is no time to be complacent and I look forward to further improvements in both enforcement and prevention over the coming years.

£125k cut from Barnet road fund

Question No: 2015/3547

Andrew Dismore

How do you justify the cut of £125,000 in Barnet’s expected funding from the Mayor of London and TfL for road and transport works; this funding was due to be spent on supporting the development and regeneration of Barnet’s town centres and the council have now had to reduce the number of town centre regeneration schemes in their Local Implementation Plan submission to TfL.

Written response from the Mayor

There has not been a cut to LIP funding. The LIP funding for all 33 London local authorities was fixed for three years announced in 2013, for the period 2014/15 through to 2016/17 at £147m per annum for the whole of London, with Barnet receiving £3.325m per annum.

 

 

FacebookTwitterLinkedInShare