MQ Frep answers Dec 19

Fires in other residential buildings with cladding

Question No: 2019/20908

Andrew Dismore

Since the Grenfell Tower fire, how many primary fires have occurred in residential buildings below 18m high, with ACM or another form of cladding (e.g. timber or HPL) that proves to contribute to fire spread?

Fires in other residential buildings with cladding

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

London Fire Brigade collects data on fires in the format of the national Incident Recording System (IRS) which is maintained by the Home Office. The IRS includes a question that asks whether there was “any special method of building construction involved” in the fire. This question includes “cladding” (of any description) as one of nine prescribed answers which also includes issues such as timber framed or sandwich panels. The table below shows that from January 2017 to date there have been 30 fires in low rise flats (under 10 storeys) where cladding has been recorded as a special method of building construction.

Property Type 2017 2018 2019*
Converted Flat/Maisonettes – 3 or more storeys
House in Multiple Occupation – 3 or more storeys (not known if licensed)
Licensed House in Multiple Occupation – 3 or more storeys
Purpose built flat – number floors unknown
Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 10 or more storeys 6 7 8
Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – 4 to 9 storeys 4 10 14
Purpose Built Flats/Maisonettes – Up to 3 storeys 1
Unlicensed House in Multiple Occupation – 3 or more storeys  

* 10 December 2019

Answer for Fires in other residential buildings with cladding

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

Non-ACM related suspension of stay put (1)

Question No: 2019/20909

Andrew Dismore

Thank you for your answer to question 2019/20476 in which you stated 135 residential buildings have had stay put suspended. Please provide a categorisation of the reasons which have caused the move to suspension of stay put.

Non-ACM related suspension of stay put (1)

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

The 135 premises that have temporarily suspended their stay put strategy for reasons other than the presence of ACM cladding have done so for a number of reasons. These include awaiting test results for potentially non-compliant cladding/ façade system, the presence of High Pressure Laminate (HPL) cladding, concerns over insulation materials, missing cavity barriers in voids and façade systems, compartmentation issues and issues with ventilation systems.

Answer for Non-ACM related suspension of stay put (1)

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

Non-ACM related suspension of stay put (3)

Question No: 2019/20911

Andrew Dismore

Please provide a borough breakdown of the 135 buildings with stay put suspended for a reason other than ACM cladding, and for each borough note how many buildings are social sector and how many are privately owned.

Non-ACM related suspension of stay put (3)

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

Please see the table below:

 Borough Private Social TBC TOTAL
Barking and Dagenham 3 0 0 3
Barnet 0 0 0 0
Bexley 0 1 0 1
 Brent 14 0 0 14
Bromley 0 0 0 0
Camden 3 1 0 4
City Of London 1 0 0 1
Croydon 0 4 0 4
Ealing 2 0 0 2
Enfield 0 0 0 0
Greenwich 10 0 1 11
 Hackney 2 24 0 26
Hammersmith and Fulham 0 2 0 2
Haringey 0 0 0 0
 Harrow 0 0 0 0
 Havering 7 0 0 7
 Hillingdon 1 0 0 1
 Hounslow 1 0 1 2
Islington 1 4 0 5
Kensington and Chelsea 1 1 0 2
 Kingston upon Thames 0 0 0 0
Lambeth 0 0 0 0
Lewisham 3 6 0 9
Merton 0 0 0 0
Newham 9 5 0 14
Redbridge 1 0 0 1
 Richmond upon Thames 1 0 0 1
Southwark 6 5 0 11
 Sutton 9 17 0 26
Tower Hamlets 0 8 0 8
 Waltham Forest 0 0 0 0
Wandsworth 1 0 0 1
Westminster 6 0 0 6
  82 78 2 162

Answer for Non-ACM related suspension of stay put (3)

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

Boroughs affected by stay-put suspension

Question No: 2019/20912

Andrew Dismore

Please provide a borough breakdown of the 117 residential buildings in London that have had stay put suspended because of the presence of ACM cladding, and for each borough note how many buildings are social sector and how many are privately owned.

Boroughs affected by stay-put suspension

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

Please see the table below:

Borough Private Social TBC TOTAL
Barking and Dagenham 3 0 0 3
Barnet 0 0 0 0
Bexley 0 1 0 1
 Brent 14 0 0 14
Bromley 0 0 0 0
Camden 3 1 0 4
City Of London 1 0 0 1
Croydon 0 4 0 4
Ealing 2 0 0 2
Enfield 0 0 0 0
Greenwich 10 0 1 11
 Hackney 2 24 0 26
Hammersmith and Fulham 0 2 0 2
Haringey 0 0 0 0
 Harrow 0 0 0 0
 Havering 7 0 0 7
 Hillingdon 1 0 0 1
 Hounslow 1 0 1 2
Islington 1 4 0 5
Kensington and Chelsea 1 1 0 2
 Kingston upon Thames 0 0 0 0
Lambeth 0 0 0 0
Lewisham 3 6 0 9
Merton 0 0 0 0
Newham 9 5 0 14
Redbridge 1 0 0 1
 Richmond upon Thames 1 0 0 1
Southwark 6 5 0 11
 Sutton 9 17 0 26
Tower Hamlets 0 8 0 8
 Waltham Forest 0 0 0 0
Wandsworth 1 0 0 1
Westminster 6 0 0 6
  82 78 2 162

Answer for Boroughs affected by stay-put suspension

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

Fire and Rescue Unit crew mobility

Question No: 2019/20925

Andrew Dismore

Concerns have been raised with me regarding a lack of station mobility for FRU-qualified firefighters. Will you consider how to ensure these essential staff do not become “trapped” by their qualifications?

Fire and Rescue Unit crew mobility

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

London Fire Brigade’s Establishment and Performance Team continuously review skills and establishment levels across the Fire Rescue Unit (FRU) fleet ensuring that where possible transfers can take place, this is dependent upon the availability of personnel to train.

A review of the FRU function has been completed by Operational Policy and Assurance and the report will recommend that further work is undertaken to explore the benefits of ‘dedicated rescue’. This would result in a reduced qualification requirement, increased training capacity, cost savings and improved levels of competence. It would also identify a transparent process for entry to and exit from the dedicated FRU role at all ranks. This report will be submitted to the relevant Directorate Boards in due course.

Answer for Fire and Rescue Unit crew mobility

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 Report (1)

Question No: 2019/20928

Andrew Dismore

What action are you taking to ensure the recommendations from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 Report are implemented promptly and effectively?

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 Report (1)

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

London Fire Brigade (LFB) has developed a detailed action plan to monitor and report on all Grenfell-related improvements across the Brigade. The scale and wide-ranging nature of Grenfell Tower-related improvements has led LFB to utilise both existing and new governance arrangements to organise, prioritise and deliver these improvements, including the Operational Improvement Process and the establishment of a Grenfell Tower Oversight and Assurance Board (formerly the Grenfell Tower Improvement Board).

The London Fire Commissioner has extended the role of the Grenfell Tower Investigation and Review Team and has directed the Assistant Commissioner that leads the team to monitor, report and provide assurance on progress of improvements arising from the recommendations. The new monitoring and reporting functions are led by a newly recruited senior member of staff who will be supported by a small team, with the relevant project management and audit/assurance knowledge and experience.

Answer for Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 Report (1)

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 Report (2)

Question No: 2019/20929

Andrew Dismore

What processes will you put in place to monitor the implementation of the recommendations made in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 Report?

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 Report (2)

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

London Fire Brigade (LFB) welcomes the recommendations set out by Sir Martin Moore-Bick. The Brigade will carefully consider the implementation of the recommendations, including those directed at building owners, which are likely to have a significant impact on LFB and all fire and rescue services. The London Fire Commissioner is submitting details of its action plan to my office and the Home Office which will detail improvements already in place, and those that are currently being scoped and delivered, in response to the internal investigation and Inquiry. This will be updated and provided to me and the Home Office on a monthly basis for at least three months to demonstrate progress. LFB acknowledges the wider conclusions set out in the Inquiry Phase 1 report and the systemic issues identified by Sir Martin Moore-Bick. The resulting need for transformational change is fully recognised and is being acted upon.

Answer for Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 1 Report (2)

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

West Hampstead cottages refurbishment timeline

Question No: 2019/20933

Andrew Dismore

In relation to DMFD34, now that a contractor has been assigned to the West Hampstead cottages, what is the timeline for the works and the completion date?

West Hampstead cottages refurbishment timeline

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

The works commenced on 18 November and the current programme schedules completion by May 2020, subject to specific project risks and dependencies. Full re-occupation is expected to take place in the summer of 2020.

Answer for West Hampstead cottages refurbishment timeline

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

LFB premise asset replacement works

Question No: 2019/20934

Andrew Dismore

DMFD44 allocates £3,374,544 for premises asset replacement works. What items are contained under this heading that the money will be spent on?

LFB premise asset replacement works

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

This funding covers a portfolio of capital projects primarily focused on those listed in the table below.

Project Location
Heating replacement projects Surbiton and Acton fire stations
Electrical rewire projects Hainault, Richmond and East Greenwich fire stations
Window replacement project Chingford fire station
Roof replacement projects Clapham and Stoke Newington fire stations
Appliance bay door replacement projects Soho, Brixton and Paddington fire stations

Answer for LFB premise asset replacement works

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

Fire safety qualification and training contract award (3)

Question No: 2019/20935

Andrew Dismore

In relation to DMFD25 on the award of a fire safety training contract, why was the contractor Xact Consultancy and Training ltd chosen over Babcock?

Fire safety qualification and training contract award (3)

The Mayor

Last updated: 07 January, 2020

Babcock did not submit a bid for this contract. Three companies submitted bids and, following a tendering process, Xact were named as the preferred bidder.

Answer for Fire safety qualification and training contract award (3)

The Mayor

Last updated: 24 December, 2019

Officers are drafting a response

 

FacebookTwitterLinkedInShare